Political Parallels?

I just read that the leader of Pakistan's opposition party, Benazir Bhutto, has been assassinated by a suicide bomber. In response, her opponent President Musharraf (who put the country under martial law following a very suspicious "election") has cracked down to "defend democracy" by not allowing any public political gatherings in the wake of the attack. Mournful demonstrators have been gathering and declaring her death a martyrdom, accusing Musharraf of complicity while he postures as the defender of democracy by accusing "radicals" and "terrorists" of the assassination and vowing that his military crackdowns will defend freedom in that country. But critics in the West have said that while Bhutto was a reason for hope in Pakistan, her regime was not unmarked by corruption as well. She had stood accused of pilfering 1.5 billion and also of having one of the worst human rights records in recent history (Link).
I cant help but notice the parallels to our own unfolding political story here in the west -- we have a sitting President who pretty much stole a corrupt election and has been wielding the "war on terror" club to undermine everything from individual rights to human rights to oversight by the judicial branch, which has pretty much been whittled down to a small stick at this point. We also have an opposition leader in Hillary Clinton that we don't entirely trust, and whose record is not entirely free of the blemishes of political corruption.
As the upcoming presidential election gets closer, more than a few Americans have been wondering if there are going to be any mysterious maneuverings involving "terrorists" that might necessitate martial law in the US, or even just prevent a fair election. Bush's "war on terror" rhetoric is wearing pretty thin for most people, but that's nothing that a nice bombing or hijacking couldnt fix overnight. I'm not saying anything is going to happen... just noticing... parallels.
