After Hugo Chavez hit the floor of the UN, calling Bush "the Devil" the week after the Bush administration seems to have sponsored a coup that removed him from office for a couple of days, you would think that sombody in the American or British media could have linked these two recent events. But instead I wake up and see headlines like "Chavez Blasts US".
John D. emailed me a full transcript of Chavez's speech at the UN (
link ) that makes it very clear that Chavez's speech was directly aimed at Bush and the corrupt US Government and its policies, not the everyday people of America who, he pointed out, when asked want peace.
The other thing that I find absurd is the fact that I read The New York Times, Washington Post, BBC, every DAY through RSS feeds that let me scan and see what's going on. It's my ritual... get up, check the news, get dressed, etc. Not ONE story did I see in any of those papers about the coup in Venezuela. Not ONE story about the leader of the country that has the most crude oil in the world being unseated in a coup. And yet... when the leader of that country hits the floor of the UN and denounces the corrupt US administration, the newspapers are all over it - without one mention about the real reason the guy might be a little ticked off.
I actually think that Chavez's speech was a smart move. I'm probably the only one you'll hear saying this - but traditionally in dealing with Latin American populist leaders who want justice for the poor of their nations, the US Government has usually acted swiftly and effectively, usually either fuelling military coups that remove the leader from office or through assasination. Henry Kissinger and Pinochet (who has now been found guilty of these crimes) arranged for many a South American socialist activist to be thrown out of military C-10's over the Pacific to drown while gagged and bound. But you don't hear about dead socialists and their families in the mainstream press. Chavez is a marked man. The quiet little coup that took place last weekend is just the beginning and he knows it (remember that Chavez is the man that Pat Robertson said "we" ought to assasinate and be done with). But now he has the entire world's attention, because he went to the UN and made some really inflammatory remarks to taunt the US president. "How are you going to murder me while the whole world is watching NOW?" -- that's all I hear in that speech. Self-preservation.
Here's an interesting Op-Ed piece from a non-mainstream outlet that has some interesting points to it, including that fact that after Hurrican Katrina the Venezuelan leader offered to drop the price of oil coming from his country by one third, from $75 to $50 a barrel - and how Bush refused him because he is in bed with the Saudis and has a stake in keeping the price of oil nice and high.
LinkAnd here's another great piece about the distortions in our mainstream press about politics in Venezuela from Alternet. (
Link ) Here's an exerpt:
"Look at the Chronicle/AP photo of the anti-Chavez marchers in Venezuela. Note their color. White.
And not just any white. A creamy rich white.
I interviewed them and recorded in this order: a banker in high heels and push-up bra; an oil industry executive (same outfit); and a plantation owner who rode to Caracas in a silver Jaguar.
And the color of the pro-Chavez marchers? Dark brown. Brown and round as cola nuts -- just like their hero, their President Chavez. They wore an unvarying uniform of jeans and T-shirts."
The writer points out that in 2002, when every American newspaper reported that Chavez had resigned from his post but was later revealed that Chavez had been kidnapped at gunpoint, incarcerated by his captors, and forced to resign, this writer asked a reporter why all these newspapers got the story wrong.
"The U.S. papers got it dead wrong -- but how? Who was the source of this "resignation" lie? I asked a U.S. reporter why American news media had reported this nonsense as stone fact without checking. The reply was that it came from a reliable source: 'We got it from the State Department.' "
"Oh."